Introduction
The three articles listed below form a technical continuation of the earlier public series Walking the Same Road.
Where the earlier series focused on retraining perception and exposing shared assumptions, this trilogy undertakes explicit analytical, historical, and constructive work. It makes underlying patterns of reasoning, hermeneutical commitments, and ontological assumptions visible and subject to evaluation.
Who this series is for
This series is written for readers who wish to pursue these questions at a fully technical level. It assumes some familiarity with theological argument, biblical interpretation, and philosophical categories.
The articles are not required in order to understand the public series, but they exist to show that the conclusions reached there are not intuitive or rhetorical, but can be sustained through careful analysis.
The Technical Trilogy
1. Are We Reasoning the Same Way?
An analytical examination of how shared patterns of reasoning shape theological conclusions before exegesis begins.
→ (link will go here)
2. How Did This Way of Reasoning Arise?
A genealogical and historical investigation into how these patterns developed and became normalised within Christian thought.
→ (link will go here)
3. Is There a Thicker Alternative?
A constructive proposal for a more robust theological grammar grounded in Scripture, relational ontology, and Paul’s creational logic.
→ (link will go here)
Relation to the wider project
This technical trilogy belongs within the broader Genesis2Paul project, which seeks to recover the internal coherence between Genesis and Paul.
Readers who wish to begin with a more accessible introduction should start with the earlier public series.